On May 7, 2025, at 10:31 AM IST, the world is once again gripped by the specter of conflict between India and Pakistan, two nuclear-armed neighbors with a history of rivalry dating back to their partition in 1947. The recent Indian military operation, codenamed Operation Sindoor, targeted terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) in retaliation for the April 22, 2025, terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Kashmir, which killed 26 civilians, including 25 Indians and one Nepali. This escalation, while aimed at countering terrorism, has drawn sharp criticism from Pakistan, which reported civilian casualties and vowed a response, raising fears of a broader conflict. The international community’s varied reactions underscore the complexity of the situation, with some nations supporting India’s right to self-defense, others backing Pakistan, and many calling for restraint. This editorial explores the historical context, stakeholder perspectives, and strategic considerations, advocating for diplomacy to prevent a catastrophic escalation.
The India-Pakistan conflict over Kashmir is rooted in the 1947 partition, which created two nations with competing claims over the region. Since then, they have fought three wars (1947, 1965, and 1971) and numerous skirmishes, with Kashmir remaining a flashpoint. Key turning points include the 1999 Kargil War, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, and the 2019 Pulwama attack, which killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel and led to Indian airstrikes in Balakot, Pakistan. The 2021 Line of Control (LoC) ceasefire offered temporary calm, but recurring militant attacks, such as the Pahalgam massacre, have reignited tensions. The April 22, 2025, attack, attributed to The Resistance Front (TRF), a Lashkar-e-Taiba affiliate, prompted India to launch Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, targeting nine terrorist sites in Bahawalpur, Muridke, Sialkot, Kotli, and Muzaffarabad (Operation Sindoor strikes). Pakistan’s claim of civilian casualties, including damage to the Bilal Mosque in Muzaffarabad, has fueled controversy, with Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif calling the strikes an “act of war” (India-Pakistan strikes).
Operation Sindoor: Details and Implications
Operation Sindoor was a joint operation by the Indian Army, Navy, and Air Force, using precision strike weapons, including loitering munitions, launched from Indian soil. The Indian Ministry of Defence emphasized that the strikes were “focused, measured, and non-escalatory,” targeting infrastructure linked to banned groups like Jaish-e-Mohammed, Lashkar-e-Taiba, and Hizbul Mujahideen, with no Pakistani military facilities hit (Press Information Bureau). Indian intelligence provided coordinates, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi monitored the operation, reflecting a strategic response to domestic pressure for action. However, Pakistan reported nine civilian deaths, including a child, and 38 injuries, alleging that India targeted civilian areas, escalating tensions (NPR missile attacks). The operation’s timing, hours before a planned nationwide security drill in India, underscores the heightened state of alert.
International Reactions
The global response to Operation Sindoor reflects the delicate balance of geopolitics in South Asia. U.S. President Donald Trump described the situation as “a shame,” noting the decades-long conflict and expressing hope for a swift resolution (World leaders react). U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, while monitoring developments, reaffirmed cooperation with India against terrorism and urged both nations to avoid escalation (US urges de-escalation). The UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres expressed deep concern, calling for “maximum military restraint” to prevent a nuclear confrontation. Japan’s Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi condemned the Pahalgam attack but urged dialogue to stabilize South Asia. Israel’s Ambassador Reuven Azar explicitly supported India’s right to self-defense, aligning with India’s counterterrorism stance.
Conversely, China’s Foreign Ministry labeled India’s actions “reg- India’s actions “regrettable,” supporting Pakistan’s call for an impartial investigation and urging restraint (World leaders react). Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, while advocating de-escalation, maintains strong defense ties with Pakistan, evidenced by recent military visits. Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov offered mediation, reflecting a neutral stance, while Iran proposed de-escalation talks. These reactions highlight the polarized international landscape, with the U.S. and Israel leaning toward India, China and Turkey supporting Pakistan, and others advocating neutrality.
Stakeholder Perspectives
India’s Perspective
India justifies Operation Sindoor as a necessary response to Pakistan’s alleged support for terrorism. The government accuses Pakistan of providing safe havens to groups like TRF, which orchestrated the Pahalgam attack. Prime Minister Modi, under domestic pressure, vowed to punish perpetrators, framing the strikes as a defense of national sovereignty (Times of India). India’s strategy emphasizes precision to avoid escalation, but the operation risks retaliatory strikes, as seen in Pakistan’s reported shelling along the LoC, killing six and injuring over 30 (The Hindu).
Pakistan’s Perspective
Pakistan denies involvement in the Pahalgam attack, condemning India’s strikes as targeting civilians and violating sovereignty. Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s vow to respond reflects domestic pressure to counter India’s actions (Hindustan Times). Pakistan’s military claims to have shot down Indian jets and destroyed an Indian brigade headquarters, though these claims lack independent verification (ARY News X post). The civilian casualty narrative strengthens Pakistan’s call for international condemnation of India.
International Community
The U.S. balances support for India’s counterterrorism efforts with calls for de-escalation, reflecting its strategic partnership with India and diminished ties with Pakistan (US-India relations). China’s support for Pakistan aligns with its Belt and Road investments and rivalry with India. Turkey’s position is influenced by historical solidarity with Pakistan on Kashmir. Neutral actors like Russia and Iran seek to prevent a regional crisis, while the UN emphasizes the nuclear risks (New York Times).
Expert Insights
Experts highlight the high stakes of the conflict. Frank O’Donnell from the Stimson Center notes that both nations have a “higher risk appetite for conflict initiation and escalation” since 2019, increasing the chance of miscalculation (Reuters military risks). Muhammad Faisal, a South Asia security researcher, suggests India faces a dilemma in allocating resources between Pakistan and China, complicating its strategy. Former Indian Air Vice Marshal Anil Golani believes neither side seeks all-out war, but public pressure could force escalation. Pakistani ex-pilot Kaiser Tufail warns that a more incisive Indian strike could trigger dangerous escalation, given both nations’ nuclear arsenals.
Strategic Considerations for India
India faces a multifaceted challenge in addressing countries supporting Pakistan and managing the broader situation. Below are key strategies:
Countering China’s Support
China’s backing of Pakistan, rooted in strategic and economic ties, poses a significant challenge. India should leverage its growing partnership with the U.S., as evidenced by the February 2025 India-U.S. Joint Statement, to counterbalance China’s influence (India-U.S. Joint Statement). Engaging in multilateral forums like the Quad can amplify India’s position. Diplomatically, India could emphasize shared interests in regional stability to China, while presenting evidence of Pakistan’s terrorism links to the UN Security Council.
Addressing Turkey’s Alignment
Turkey’s military cooperation with Pakistan, including recent visits, complicates India’s position. India should express concerns through diplomatic channels, highlighting the impact on bilateral trade and cultural ties. Engaging Turkey in regional initiatives, such as counterterrorism frameworks, could find common ground, reducing its support for Pakistan.
Strengthening Alliances
India must deepen ties with supportive nations like the U.S. and Israel. The U.S.’s designation of India as a Major Defense Partner facilitates military cooperation, which can deter Pakistan’s retaliation (U.S. security cooperation). Israel’s support can enhance intelligence-sharing and defense technology collaboration.
Diplomatic Advocacy
India should build a global case against Pakistan’s terrorism support, using evidence from the Pahalgam attack to isolate Pakistan diplomatically. Briefings to over 100 diplomatic missions post-attack indicate this strategy is underway (New York Times). Engaging neutral countries like Russia, which offered mediation, can ensure broader understanding of India’s perspective.
Military Preparedness
While maintaining readiness, India must avoid actions that could escalate into war. Operation Sindoor’s precision reflects this approach, but Pakistan’s reported LoC shelling necessitates robust border defenses. India’s planned military drills in Rajasthan signal preparedness without provocation (NDTV).
To navigate this crisis, India and the international community must prioritize diplomacy:
-
Evidence-Based Advocacy: India should present detailed intelligence on Pakistan’s terrorism links to the UN and FATF, seeking sanctions or increased scrutiny.
-
Backchannel Diplomacy: Both nations should engage in discreet talks, possibly facilitated by neutral actors like Russia or Iran, to de-escalate tensions.
-
UN Mediation: The UN should convene a special session to address the Kashmir conflict, encouraging confidence-building measures like the 1988 No Attack on Nuclear Facilities agreement (National Security Archive).
-
Regional Cooperation: Revitalizing SAARC could provide a platform for dialogue, addressing security and economic issues collaboratively.
-
U.S. Leadership: The U.S. should leverage its influence to broker talks, building on Rubio’s engagement with both nations.
Operation Sindoor was a bold response to a heinous act of terrorism, but its aftermath underscores the fragility of India-Pakistan relations. While India has the right to defend itself, the nuclear stakes demand restraint and dialogue. By strengthening alliances, engaging diplomatically, and maintaining measured military readiness, India can counter Pakistan’s supporters and work toward stability. The international community, particularly the U.S., UN, and neutral actors, must facilitate peace talks to prevent a catastrophic escalation. Only through collective action can South Asia move from conflict to cooperation, ensuring a secure future for both nations and the region.
